Skip to content

S1 · Responsible business conduct

Project assessment

Scope the project, assess impacts on people and the environment, and record prevention, remedy and follow-up.

Assessor-led guidance referencing IFC, OECD and UN frameworks. Independent studies and management-system certification remain separate.

Due diligence workflow · 3 of 3

Assess impacts, assign actions and record the decision and follow-up.

Bring context and screening references into the evidence register. Establish project findings, then save the decision, actions and review date.

Unsaved draft · held in this tab · ifc-2012-s1-2026-10-08-v1Sign in to save and export

Sign-in opens another tab. Keep this draft open, then check sign-in status here to save it.

Assessment records

Saved assessments

Sign in to save, reopen and export assessments.

Evidence and assessment gaps (23)

Review unresolved items
  • Complete the project location and activities.
  • PS2: unresolved question: Will the project employ workers, including temporary or migrant workers?
  • PS2: unresolved question: Will contractors or labour suppliers work on the project?
  • PS2: unresolved question: Will primary suppliers provide goods or materials for the project?
  • PS3: unresolved question: Could activities affect resource use, water, air, waste or pollution?
  • PS4: unresolved question: Could nearby people experience changes in health, safety, access or services?
  • PS4: unresolved question: Will public or private security personnel protect the project?
  • PS5: unresolved question: Will the project acquire land or change rights to use land or resources?
  • PS5: unresolved question: Could people lose housing or have to move?
  • PS5: unresolved question: Could livelihoods, income, livelihoods access or informal land use be disrupted without relocation?
  • PS6: unresolved question: Could activities affect habitats, biodiversity or ecosystem services used by people?
  • PS7: unresolved question: Could Indigenous Peoples with relevant collective attachments or distinct institutions be affected?
  • PS8: unresolved question: Could works, excavation or access changes affect cultural heritage or community cultural practices?
  • PS1: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • PS2: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • PS3: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • PS4: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • PS5: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • PS6: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • PS7: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • PS8: no reviewed project evidence recorded.
  • Identify affected groups and their participation barriers.
  • Document impact pathways and significance; an empty register is not a low-impact finding.

Save the decision and follow-up

Review evidence gaps, record the assessor decision and conditions, and assign action owners and a review date. A screening result or country band is not approval to proceed.

Exports use a saved revision and its evidence snapshot. Save changes before downloading.

Review screening cases · Set counterparty monitoring · Saved assessment revisions

Contact Salient One about practitioner support

Workspace navigation

[S/1]Salient OneRisk intelligence